Skip links

Governing law clause

Understanding Governing Law Clauses in Contracts

A governing law clause is a provision embedded within a contract that specifies which jurisdiction’s laws will govern the interpretation and enforcement of the agreement. This clause is a cornerstone in contract law, particularly vital when parties hail from different jurisdictions or engage in cross-border transactions.

Importance of Governing Law Clauses

  • Clarity and Predictability: Establishing which legal framework applies reduces uncertainty, making the terms of the contract more predictable.
  • Dispute Resolution: Knowing the governing law helps streamline the dispute resolution process, ensuring that both parties understand their rights and obligations.
  • Risk Management: Mitigates risks by providing a clear understanding of applicable laws, which can be especially crucial in international agreements.

What You’ll Learn from This Article

You will gain a comprehensive understanding of:

  1. The purpose and function of governing law clauses.
  2. Factors influencing the choice of governing law.
  3. Distinctions between governing law and jurisdictional clauses.
  4. Enforceability issues surrounding these clauses.
  5. Sample governing law clauses for practical reference.
  6. Navigating international contracts with governing law provisions.
  7. Enhancing your contracts with additional provisions to improve clarity.

1. Purpose and Function of Governing Law Clauses

Primary Purpose of Governing Law Clauses

A governing law clause primarily determines which jurisdiction’s laws will be used to interpret and enforce the contract. This is crucial for preventing ambiguity and misunderstandings by setting a clear legal framework from the outset.

Importance of Clarity and Predictability

  • Clarity: By specifying the governing law, parties eliminate uncertainties about which legal standards apply. This is particularly important in contracts involving multiple jurisdictions.
  • Predictability: Knowing which laws will govern the contract allows parties to anticipate legal outcomes more accurately. This reduces the risk of unexpected legal complications.

Impact on Dispute Resolution Processes

Governing law clauses significantly influence how disputes are resolved:

  • Legal Proceedings: They provide a predefined set of rules, making legal proceedings more straightforward and efficient.
  • Dispute Resolution: They help determine the applicable legal principles for resolving conflicts, affecting everything from procedural rules to substantive rights.

Including a governing law clause in your contract enhances both clarity and predictability, ensuring smoother dispute resolution processes.

2. Factors Influencing the Choice of Governing Law

When drafting a contract, several key factors influence the choice of governing law. Understanding these factors helps ensure that the contract is both enforceable and advantageous for all parties involved.

Key Factors:

  1. Legal Precedent and Predictability: Parties often select a jurisdiction with well-established case law to benefit from greater predictability in legal outcomes.
  2. Neutrality: Choosing a neutral jurisdiction can help mitigate any perceived biases, particularly in international agreements where parties hail from different countries.
  3. Convenience: The governing law should be convenient for both parties in terms of understanding and compliance. This often involves choosing a jurisdiction familiar to both.
  4. Specific Legal Protections: Certain jurisdictions may offer stronger legal protections or more favorable laws for particular types of transactions, such as intellectual property or labor laws.

The role of negotiation in determining the choice of law cannot be overstated. During negotiations, each party will likely advocate for a jurisdiction they perceive as advantageous. Some might prioritize jurisdictions with less stringent regulations, while others may seek those offering robust legal frameworks.

Jurisdiction Advantages:

  1. Economic Stability: Jurisdictions with stable economies often have more reliable legal systems, making them attractive choices.
  2. Reputation for Fairness: Jurisdictions known for impartiality and fair judicial processes are often favored to reduce risks associated with biased rulings.

Choosing the right governing law requires careful consideration of these factors, ensuring that the contract remains clear, enforceable, and fair to all parties involved.

3. Jurisdictional Considerations in Governing Law Clauses

Understanding the difference between governing law clauses and jurisdictional clauses is crucial when drafting contracts. Here’s what each one means:

  • A governing law clause specifies which jurisdiction’s laws will govern the interpretation and enforcement of the contract.
  • A jurisdictional clause determines where disputes will be adjudicated.

Key Differences:

  • Governing Law Clause: Defines the substantive laws that will apply to the contract’s terms and obligations.
  • Jurisdictional Clause: Specifies the court or legal forum that will hear any disputes arising from the contract.

Example Scenarios:

  1. Same Jurisdiction for Both: A contract might stipulate that both the governing law and dispute adjudication occur within the same jurisdiction. For instance, “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of California, and any disputes shall be resolved in California courts.”
  2. Different Jurisdictions for Laws and Courts: Parties might choose one jurisdiction’s substantive laws while agreeing to resolve disputes in another jurisdiction’s courts. An example could be, “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of New York, but any disputes shall be resolved in Florida courts.”

Practical Considerations:

  • Convenience: Selecting jurisdictions based on convenience can streamline legal proceedings.
  • Legal Strategy: Strategic selection can leverage favorable local laws or judicial efficiency.
  • International Contracts: Different jurisdictions may be chosen to balance interests and mitigate risks across borders.

Understanding these distinctions helps create contracts with clear legal guidelines, reducing ambiguity in potential disputes.

4. Enforceability Issues with Governing Law Clauses

General Legal Principles

The enforceability of governing law clauses depends on several basic legal principles. Courts usually uphold these clauses as long as they are clear, agreed upon by both parties, and do not go against any major public policy concerns. The principle of party autonomy allows contracting parties to choose the applicable law, as long as the choice is genuine and does not conflict with fundamental policies of the forum jurisdiction.

Situations Challenging Enforceability

Certain circumstances may challenge the enforceability of governing law clauses:

  1. Strong Connections to Another Forum: If a contract has significant connections to a jurisdiction other than the one specified in the governing law clause, courts might override the chosen law. For instance, if most contractual activities occur in a different jurisdiction or involve residents of that jurisdiction, local courts may apply their own laws instead.
  2. Public Policy Concerns: When a chosen law conflicts with the public policy of the forum state, courts may refuse to enforce the clause. For example, if the selected law permits practices that are illegal or considered unethical in the forum state, such as usurious interest rates or unfair labor practices, enforcement may be denied.
  3. Mandatory Provisions: Some jurisdictions have mandatory legal provisions that cannot be overridden by contract terms. If a governing law clause attempts to bypass these mandatory laws, it risks being unenforceable.

Court Recognition

Courts generally strive to respect and uphold governing law clauses to honor party autonomy and contractual freedom. However, they balance this respect with their duty to ensure fairness and adherence to public policy:

“Courts will not enforce a governing law clause if its application would result in outcomes that starkly contradict the forum state’s fundamental principles.”

Examples of Enforcement Challenges

  1. International Contracts: In international agreements where multiple legal systems are involved, enforcing a governing law clause can become complex. Courts may examine whether applying foreign laws would introduce unfairness or conflict with local mandatory provisions.
  2. Consumer Protection Laws: Contracts involving consumers often face scrutiny under local consumer protection laws which cannot be waived by agreement. A governing law clause attempting to sidestep these protections is likely unenforceable.

Understanding these potential challenges helps in drafting robust governing law clauses that minimize enforceability issues while ensuring clarity and predictability in legal proceedings.

5. Sample Governing Law Clauses for Reference

When drafting a governing law clause, it’s essential to consider the specific jurisdictions involved and potential conflict of laws principles. Below are some standard sample clauses referencing specific states or countries:

Example Clauses

  • New York, USA:

“This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to its conflict of laws principles.”

  • England and Wales:

“This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales.”

  • California, USA:

“This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflict of laws rules.”

Tailoring Sample Clauses

To address conflict of laws principles effectively, it’s beneficial to customize these samples based on the context of your contract:

1. Specify Conflict Principles

Including language that explicitly excludes or includes certain conflict principles can help clarify how disputes will be managed.

Example:

“This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas, excluding any provisions or principles that would require application of the law of another jurisdiction.”

2. Incorporate International Considerations

For international contracts, consider specifying how conflicts between different legal systems will be handled.

Example:

“This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Germany. In case of any conflict between German law and mandatory provisions of another jurisdiction involved in this transaction, German law shall prevail to the extent permitted.”

3. Address Specific Claims

Clarify how particular types of claims, such as tort claims, will be governed.

Example:

“All contractual and non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Japan.”

Adapting these clauses to fit your needs ensures clarity and helps mitigate potential legal ambiguities.

These examples highlight how governing law clauses can specify jurisdictions while addressing potential conflicts.

6. Navigating International Contracts with Governing Law Clauses

International contracts pose unique challenges, particularly when selecting a governing law. Here are key difficulties and considerations:

Challenges in International Agreements

1. Diverse Legal Systems

  • Different countries have varied legal principles and practices.
  • This diversity can lead to complexities in interpreting contract terms uniformly.

2. Conflicting Mandatory Laws

  • Each jurisdiction has mandatory laws that cannot be waived by contract.
  • These laws can override the chosen governing law, leading to disputes.

3. Jurisdictional Conflicts

  • Parties may be subject to multiple jurisdictions.
  • Conflicts arise when jurisdictions have competing laws or interests.

Aligning with Mandatory Laws

Aligning the governing law clause with mandatory laws from all involved jurisdictions is crucial to avoid conflicts and ensure enforceability.

1. Research and Due Diligence

  • Conduct thorough research on mandatory laws in relevant jurisdictions.
  • Identify any non-negotiable legal requirements that must be incorporated into the contract.

2. Legal Consultation

  • Engage legal experts familiar with the jurisdictions involved.
  • Their expertise can help draft clauses that respect all pertinent mandatory laws.

3. Clear Drafting

  • Clearly state which jurisdiction’s law will govern the contract.
  • Include provisions addressing how conflicts between mandatory laws will be handled.

Practical Examples

Consider a contract between a US company and a German firm:

1. Governing Law Clause Example:

“This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, USA.”

2. Addressing Mandatory Laws:

Add a provision to comply with Germany’s mandatory employment regulations if the contract involves German employees.

By proactively addressing these factors, you reduce the risk of disputes and ensure smoother execution of international contracts.

7. Enhancing Governing Law Clauses with Additional Provisions

To make governing law clauses more effective, it’s important to include additional provisions. These enhancements ensure that the clause covers potential legal complexities and provides a strong framework for resolving disputes.

Key Enhancements for Governing Law Clauses

1. Tort Claims Coverage

One significant enhancement involves explicitly including language that covers tort claims. This ensures that any wrongful actions related to the contract will also be governed by the chosen law.

Example: “This Agreement, including any claims arising out of or relating to wrongful actions, shall be governed by the laws of [specified jurisdiction].”

2. Conflict of Laws Principles

Addressing conflict of laws principles within the clause can proactively manage issues related to differences between various jurisdictions’ laws.

Example: “The governing law for this Agreement shall exclude any application of conflict of laws principles that would result in the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.”

3. Specific Legal Areas

Tailoring clauses to cover specific areas such as intellectual property, data protection, or employment law can provide more detailed guidance in those fields.

Example: “Notwithstanding the general governing law provision, any matters relating to intellectual property rights shall be governed by [specified jurisdiction’s] intellectual property laws.”

4. Jurisdictional Coverage

Specifying how different jurisdictions will handle specific types of claims can avoid confusion.

Example: “While this Agreement is governed by the laws of [specified jurisdiction], any disputes concerning employment matters shall be resolved under the laws and courts of [another jurisdiction].”

5. Arbitration and Mediation Compatibility

Including provisions that align with arbitration or mediation processes can streamline dispute resolution.

Example: “Any disputes arising under this Agreement shall first be referred to mediation under the rules of [mediation body], with subsequent arbitration governed by the laws specified herein.”

6. Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events

Provisions addressing force majeure events help clarify how such situations will be managed under the chosen law.

Example: “In the event of a force majeure, this Agreement shall continue to be governed by [specified jurisdiction’s] laws regarding such events.”

Benefits of Additional Wording

  • Clarity and Predictability: Adding precise language reduces ambiguity, making it clear how different scenarios will be handled legally.
  • Comprehensive Coverage: Ensures all potential claims, not just contractual breaches, are covered under the governing law.
  • Legal Consistency: Helps maintain consistency across various legal areas impacted by the contract.

By carefully crafting these enhancements into your governing law clause, you create a more resilient agreement capable of navigating complex legal landscapes effectively.

Conclusion: Best Practices for Drafting Effective Governing Law Clauses

When drafting governing law clauses, several key considerations ensure their effectiveness:

  1. Clarity and Specificity: Clearly specify the jurisdiction whose laws will govern the contract. Ambiguity can lead to disputes and legal complications.
  2. Relevance: Choose a governing law that has a logical connection to the contract or the parties involved. This helps in enforcing the clause and reduces challenges.
  3. Alignment with Public Policy: Ensure that the chosen law does not conflict with public policies of the jurisdictions involved. Courts may refuse to uphold clauses that contravene local laws.
  4. Consideration of Mandatory Laws: Particularly in international contracts, align the governing law with mandatory laws of all relevant jurisdictions to avoid conflicts.
  5. Additional Provisions: Enhance your governing law clause by including provisions that address potential areas of conflict, such as tort claims or specific types of disputes.

By following these best practices, you create strong governing law clauses that provide clarity, reduce uncertainty, and make dispute resolution smoother. This strengthens the overall enforceability and reliability of your contracts.

🍪 This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.

Book a demo today

Please fill out the form below